Status: OPEN, 14 sh @ USD 90.10 avg (3 @ 89.00 on 2026-08-27, 11 @ 90.40 on 2026-08-31; EUR 1,093.39).
Bought without a thesis; this document is the thesis written after the fact on 2026-09-02 at USD 89.81.
Data: stock-data-analyst pass 2026-09-02 (SEC 8-K/10-Q, yfinance, Finnhub); fact-check pass same day
(EDGAR Form 4 and 8-K, earnings transcripts, House Clerk PTR PDFs). Plan: INTC_plan.json.
Execution log: INTC_execution.md.
Intel is a turnaround in a capital-intensive industry: it is rebuilding its manufacturing lead (18A, then 14A) while its products lose share, and it is paying for the fabs with other people's money. Graham's earnings formula does not work at a loss-to-profit inflection (rule-004), so the framework is four questions, each with numbers:
| Layer | Question | Numbers to watch | Where it breaks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Survival and funding | Can it pay for the fabs without selling more of itself? | Operating cash flow vs capex; net cash; share count; grant and partner cash | Capex above USD 20B in 2026 and "significantly above" that in 2027; every shortfall so far has been met by issuing shares. |
| Execution milestones | Is 18A shipping at good yields and cost, and is 14A getting a customer? | Gross margin; Panther Lake volume and unit cost; Clearwater Forest availability; foundry external revenue; a named 14A customer | Foundry loses ~USD 2B a quarter; no external customer is named for 18A or 14A. |
| Insider alignment | Do the people who know buy or sell? | Form 4: CEO and CFO purchases; any discretionary sales | Owner's rule: selling is a deal-breaker. |
| Price vs what must be true | What earnings and margin does USD 90 already assume? | Forward P/E, price to tangible book, the EPS the price needs under Graham, scenario values | 59x forward earnings; the price needs USD 12–17B of net income by 2028. |
Intel 18A is on track, by Intel's own statements (this is the node the owner called "18nm"; it is a 1.8nm-class process). Q2 2026 call, 23 Jul 2026: "18A output increased meaningfully in the quarter. Yields continue to track ahead of expectations." Panther Lake is in high-volume manufacturing for "a subset" of SKUs, with unit cost down ~50% year-to-date and 20% more planned. Clearwater Forest (Xeon 6+, first 18A server part) launched 2 Jun 2026 at the end of its revised window and is available from Dell, HPE, Lenovo and Supermicro. 18A-P entered risk production on time. 14A: PDK 0.9 due October, risk production 2H 2027, volume 2028. In July Intel deleted the 10-K language that it might cancel 14A without an external customer and said it has "committed to completing" it.
The CEO buys and does not sell. Lip-Bu Tan: 1.04M shares at USD 23.96 in March 2025 (USD 25M, required by his offer letter) and 105,263 shares at USD 95.00 on 11 Aug 2026 (USD 10M, purchased inside the public offering at the offering price, not on the open market). No sales. CFO David Zinsner bought USD 250K at 42.50 in January 2026 and has sold nothing. The only sales in twelve months: a departing Chief Legal Officer (USD 5M), the retiring chair (USD 9M, Form 144s), and the Foundry chief trimming ~9% of his holding (USD 2.5M). No cluster. The owner's insider test passes today.
The Pelosi trades are real. House Clerk periodic transaction reports: 29 May 2026, spouse bought 200 INTC call options, USD 50 strike, expiring 19 Mar 2027, USD 1–5M; 24 Jul 2026, 50 more USD 50 calls (USD 250–500K) and 10,000 shares (USD 500K–1M). No sales disclosed. Two things to understand about this signal: deep-in-the-money calls bought with the stock at ~USD 115–120 are a leveraged long, not information about 18A yields; and the filing reached the public 25–45 days after the trade, after the stock had already moved. Rule-001: this is attention, not analysis. The CEO's Form 4 is the insider signal; a member of Congress is a follower like everyone else.
| # | Test | Evidence (2026-09-02) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cash after SBC | TTM GAAP operating income ≈ 0 (−0.08B); adjusted FCF USD 2.8B TTM only with partner and grant cash; 2026 capex guided above USD 20B against 1H operating cash flow of USD 8.1B; SBC USD 2.4B a year | FAIL today: not self-funding while the fabs are built |
| 2 | Balance sheet survives a bad year | Debt USD 50.5B; cash ~USD 52B after the August offering (net cash ~USD 2B); investment grade (Baa2 / BBB); dividend suspended since Q4 2024 and barred by the CHIPS terms | AMBER: it survives because it just raised USD 22.6B |
| 3 | Not funding itself with shares | Since July 2025: US government 433M shares at 20.47 (plus a 240M-share warrant at 20.00 if Intel's foundry stake drops below 51%), SoftBank 87M at 23.00, Nvidia 215M at 23.28, public offering 242M at 95.00 on 12 Aug 2026. Share count 4,377M → 5,285M, +21% in 13 months; plus USD 6.5B of new bonds in April 2026 | FAIL: the company sold USD 22.6B of stock at 95 two weeks before this position was bought at 90. The issuer was the seller. |
| 4 | Insiders not selling in a cluster | CEO and CFO net buyers, no sales; only departing or retiring people sold | PASS |
| 5 | Story matches the financials | The milestones show up in the numbers: revenue +25% YoY in Q2, gross margin 40% (from 36–38%), DCAI +59%, foundry revenue +31%. But foundry still loses USD 2.1B a quarter, no external 18A/14A customer is named (Fortinet is on Intel 4), and the government mark-to-market charge produced an USD 11B GAAP loss | AMBER: real progress, priced as if finished |
One pass, two ambers, two fails. Intel is a turnaround that has cleared its first milestones, not yet a good business by this checklist: it does not fund itself and it dilutes.
Price USD 89.81; 5,285M shares; market cap ~USD 475B; EV/sales ~8.3x; P/B 4.3x, P/TBV 5.4x (post-offering) on ~0% return on equity.
| Basis | EPS | P/E | Implied growth (P/E − 8.5) / 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026E non-GAAP consensus | 1.51 | 59.5x | 25.5% |
| FY2027E non-GAAP consensus | 2.04 | 44.0x | 17.8% |
Peers: AMD 41x forward, TSMC 19x (55% gross margin, 30%+ ROE), GlobalFoundries 20x. Analysts: 4 strong buy, 15 buy, 34 hold, 2 sell; targets 75 / 115 mean / 200 high; JPMorgan Underweight at 85.
What USD 90 needs under V = EPS × (8.5 + 2g): at 10% sustained growth, EPS 3.15 (net income ~USD 17B); at 15%, EPS 2.33 (~USD 12B). Consensus FY2027 is 2.04. So the price assumes FY2028 earnings of roughly USD 12–17B on a company that earned about zero operating income in the last twelve months. That is the bull case for 18A and a 14A customer, already in the price.
Scenarios on FY2028 non-GAAP EPS (assumptions, stated so they can be argued with):
| Case | p | EPS | Multiple | Value | vs price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear: 18A products ship but foundry never lands an external anchor; PC/DC share keeps eroding; more equity | 0.30 | 1.50 | 20x | 30 | −67% |
| Base: 18A ramps, gross margin mid-40s, foundry losses narrow, no big external customer yet | 0.45 | 2.75 | 30x | 83 | −8% |
| Bull: named 14A anchor customer, gross margin 50%+, foundry near breakeven | 0.25 | 3.75 | 35x | 131 | +46% |
| Expected value | 79 | 0.88× price |
Verdict: not cheap, and not fairly priced either. The expected value is below the price; the margin of safety is negative, which is the same verdict the June review reached before the position was bought. Kelly as a go/no-go (rule-006): no edge, no adds.
EUR 1,093 is 34% of the single-name book, the largest position, above the 20% cap. The cap is a rule independent of the thesis: the position should be trimmed to 8–9 shares (≈ EUR 620–700, 20–22%). The rung ladder below then works on the remainder. This is the owner's decision; the plan records it as a pending action, not an auto-sell.
Any one fires: re-score within five trading days; exit unless the thesis survives on the new numbers.
| Rung | USD | Anchor | Action | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP1 | 115 | Analyst mean target | sell 1/3 of what remains after the trim | INTC-TP1 |
| TP2 | 141 | 30 Jun 2026 high; Graham V at g≈27% on FY27E | sell 1/3 | INTC-TP2 |
| TP3 | 200 | Analyst high | exit unless fundamentals grew into it | INTC-TP3 |
| Review | 65 | Graham V at g≈12% on FY27E; EV/price ≈ 1.2 | re-check 18A and insiders; only then is an add cheap | INTC-REVIEW65 |