Screened: 2026-05-28 | Price: 3,348 JPY (EUR ~20.80 at 161 JPY/EUR) | Source: yfinance + web
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Current price | 3,348 JPY |
| 52-week range | 937 – 3,859 JPY |
| YTD return | +126.7% (from 1,449 JPY Jan 2026) |
| 5-year return | +44.5% (from 2,273 JPY May 2021) |
| JPY/EUR FX | ~161 JPY/EUR (EUR 20.80/sh) |
Note: Stock was at 937 JPY in Jan 2026 trough. The 126% YTD rally has already happened — this is NOT a trough-entry opportunity at current price.
| Metric | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | N/A (negative) | Net loss FY2025 |
| Forward P/E | 68.0x | On FY2026 fwd EPS 49.23 JPY |
| Normalized P/E | 22.8x | Avg EPS 2022-2024: 147 JPY |
| P/B | 2.06x | Book 1,628 JPY/sh |
| P/S | 2.87x | |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.9x | EBITDA ~114.5B JPY |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 20 JPY/sh FY2025 |
| Payout ratio | 54% | On normalized basis |
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Cash | 67.3B JPY |
| Total Debt | 353.7B JPY |
| Net Debt | 286.4B JPY |
| LT Debt | 312.2B JPY |
| Working Capital | 294.3B JPY |
| Current Assets | 427.4B JPY |
| Current Liabilities | 133.1B JPY |
| Current Ratio | 3.21x |
| Equity | 578.4B JPY |
| D/E | 0.61x (gross) |
| Net Debt/EBITDA | 2.50x |
| Interest Coverage | 0.50x (EBIT/interest) — dangerously thin |
Debt trajectory: 110B (2022) → 190B (2023) → 312B (2024) → 354B (2025). The Yokkaichi expansion was entirely debt-funded. LT debt (312B) exceeds working capital (294B) — Graham F2 fails.
| Year | Revenue | Gross Profit | EBIT | Net Income | EPS | Capex | OCF | FCF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 441B | 143B | ~110B | 70B | 200 | -125B | 179B | +54B |
| 2023 | 426B | 108B | 73B | 64B | 183 | -257B | 96B | -161B |
| 2024 | 397B | 73B | 37B | 20B | 57 | -247B | 70B | -178B |
| 2025 | 410B | 55B | 1.3B | -11.8B | -34 | -111B | 100B | -11B |
All figures JPY. Revenue peaked 2022 and has not recovered. Capex peaked 2023-2024 (Yokkaichi expansion); 2025 shows first meaningful step-down to 111B. FCF was negative for three straight years (2023-2025), total FCF burn approximately -350B JPY. Capex is now declining — key thesis condition for improvement.
| Period | Per Share |
|---|---|
| H1 2022 | 36 JPY |
| H2 2022 | 45 JPY → 81 JPY FY2022 peak |
| H1 2023 | 42 JPY |
| H2 2023 | 13 JPY → 55 JPY FY2023 |
| H1 2024 | 15 JPY |
| H2 2024 | 6 JPY → 21 JPY FY2024 |
| H1 2025 | 10 JPY |
| H2 2025 | 10 JPY → 20 JPY FY2025 |
| H1 2026 | 10 JPY (declared) |
| H2 2026 | UNDECIDED |
NEVER zero — technically "uninterrupted" since 2016. But the cut from 81 JPY (FY2022) to 20 JPY (FY2025) is a 75% economic reduction. Year-end 2026 dividend is undecided. In the spirit of Graham F4 — which tests for earnings quality and dividend reliability — this is a FAIL: the dividend behaves like an economically impaired payout that tracks a deeply cyclical P&L.
Insider ownership: 3.9%. Institutional ownership: 62.6%. Japanese corporate governance norms mean insider ownership is structurally low for large industrials; no unusual open-market purchases or sales detected in data available from yfinance. No Form 4 equivalents surfaced via public searches. Neutral signal.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Analysts | 16 |
| Consensus | Buy (2.44/5 scale) |
| Mean target | 2,448 JPY |
| Median target | 2,050 JPY |
| High target | 4,200 JPY |
| Low target | 1,300 JPY |
Current price (3,348 JPY) is 37% ABOVE the analyst mean target (2,448 JPY) and 63% above median (2,050 JPY). The stock's 126% YTD rally has overshot analyst consensus by a wide margin. This is a significant red flag: the crowd has priced in a recovery that analysts have not yet validated with target upgrades.
Q1 FY2026 (reported May 12, 2026):
Q2 FY2026 guidance:
Utilization rates:
Key management comments:
The silicon wafer industry entered a structural downcycle in late 2022 after the memory/logic inventory build peaked. Key cycle markers:
The trough in price was Jan 2026 (937 JPY). The trough in fundamentals is 2025-early 2026. We are past the price trough; we are in early-innings of the fundamental recovery. The YTD +127% has consumed most of the obvious mean-reversion opportunity.
| Filter | Criterion | Data | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | Mkt cap > USD 2B | USD 8.2B | PASS |
| F2 | CR ≥ 2.0 AND LT debt < WC | CR 3.21x PASS; LT debt 312B > WC 294B FAIL | PARTIAL FAIL |
| F3 | Positive EPS 5-10y | 2022 +200, 2023 +183, 2024 +57, 2025 -34 | FAIL |
| F4 | Dividend uninterrupted | Never zero; but 75% cut peak→current | FAIL (spirit) |
| F5 | ≥33% normalized growth | Revenue -7% from peak; EPS declining | FAIL |
| F6 | P/E ≤ 15 | Trailing N/A; Forward 68x; Normalized 22.8x | FAIL |
| F7 | P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 | Normalized: 22.8 × 2.06 = 47.0 | FAIL |
Score: 1/7 PASS (F1 only)
Each fail needs to be evaluated:
Conclusion: Fails are cyclical in nature, NOT value-trap indicators. But the valuation (P/B 2.06x, normalized P/E 22.8x) reflects that the market already knows this is a cyclical trough. The discount is gone.
Normalized EPS used: 147 JPY (average 2022-2024; excludes trough year). Forward EPS: 49 JPY.
| Growth Rate | IV (Normalized) | MOS vs 3,348 | IV (Forward) | MOS vs 3,348 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 1,246 JPY | -62.8% | 418 JPY | -87.5% |
| 3% | 2,126 JPY | -36.5% | 714 JPY | -78.7% |
| 5% | 2,713 JPY | -19.0% | 911 JPY | -72.8% |
| 7.5% | 3,446 JPY | +2.9% | 1,157 JPY | -65.4% |
| 10% | 4,179 JPY | +24.8% | 1,403 JPY | -58.1% |
Break-even growth (normalized EPS): 7.2% — requires sustained 7%+ earnings CAGR from normalized earnings base to justify current price. Break-even growth (forward EPS): 29.8% — entirely unreachable with forward EPS of only 49 JPY.
The only scenario where SUMCO is fairly valued is if you use normalized earnings AND believe in sustained 7-10% EPS CAGR from cycle recovery. This is plausible (wafer duopoly, AI tailwind), but it is a growth-stock thesis, not a Graham defensive thesis.
Per shr-003: trailing vs forward P/E gap is vast (N/A vs 68x). The market is not pricing a profitability inflection at low P/E — it is pricing 2027-2028 recovery at an already-elevated multiple.
| Category | Signal | Level |
|---|---|---|
| Price action | +127% YTD; stock above all analyst targets | RED |
| Valuation | P/B 2.06x, not trough P/B; Graham IV negative on any rational basis | RED |
| Balance sheet | Net debt 286B; LT debt > WC; interest coverage 0.5x | RED |
| Dividend | 75% cut from peak; H2 2026 year-end undecided | AMBER |
| Earnings trend | Three years of FCF burn; Q1 2026 miss (-64%) | RED |
| Capex | Past peak (111B vs 257B); still absorbing depreciation wave into 2026 | AMBER |
| Analyst vs price | Stock 37% above mean analyst target | RED |
| Cycle position | Partial recovery, leading-edge improving; AI = minority of volume | AMBER |
| LTA risk | Stable; no renegotiations; volume extensions ended | GREEN |
| Customer concentration | TSMC/Samsung/Micron — top-tier counterparties | GREEN |
Active reds: 4 of 10 categories. Most damaging is valuation — stock has already run 127% and sits above every analyst target.
SUMCO is a high-quality structural asset (global #2 silicon wafer, duopoly with Shin-Etsu, 50%+ combined 300mm market share) in a cyclical trough that is partially clearing. The thesis hook is correct: capex is past peak, utilization is recovering for leading-edge, and the 2027-2028 FCF inflection is plausible.
But the thesis has already been priced in.
The stock was a strong buy at 937 JPY (Jan 2026 trough). It is now at 3,348 JPY — a 257% rally from that low, putting it 37% above the analyst consensus target of 2,448 JPY. Graham IV on normalized earnings requires 7.2% perpetual growth to justify current price (no margin of safety). On forward EPS, break-even requires 30% growth — structurally impossible with a duopoly wafer company.
Graham filter score 1/7 is forgivable for a cyclical — but P/B at 2.06x is not trough P/B. Classic Graham cyclical entry requires P/B approaching 1.0x or below during the earnings trough. At 937 JPY, P/B would have been ~0.58x — genuinely Grahamian. At 3,348 JPY and P/B 2.06x, the market has fully re-rated it to a recovery story.
This is a stock to own at the trough, not after a 257% move from the trough.
VERDICT LINE: RED — Passed the price trough by 3,400 JPY. No margin of safety at 3,348 JPY. Watchlist for re-entry only if a second leg down returns P/B toward 0.80-1.00x (entry zone ~1,300-1,600 JPY). Revisit after Q4 2026 results when FY2027 FCF trajectory becomes visible. Not suitable for current EUR satellite portfolio at current price.