TX Data Delivery Summary - December 3, 2025

DELIVERABLES COMPLETED

1. Current Quote Data ✓

File: tx_finnhub_data.json (102 KB)

2. Historical Price Data ✓

File: tx_yfinance_data.json (187 KB)

Calculated Metrics:

Technical Levels:

3. Financial Metrics ✓

Files: tx_finnhub_data.json + tx_yfinance_data.json

Valuation Ratios:

Profitability:

Dividend:

Balance Sheet:

Cash Flow:

Revenue:

4. Recent News & Events ✓

File: tx_finnhub_data.json (news section)

Q3 2025 Earnings (Oct 28-29):

Recent Headlines (15 articles):

  1. Nov 1: Earnings miss analysis
  2. Oct 30: Q3 results presentation
  3. Oct 30: Usiminas write-down impact
  4. Oct 29: Earnings call transcript
  5. Oct 5: "One of best steel options even with tariffs"

Earnings History:

5. Analyst Data ✓

File: tx_finnhub_data.json (recommendations section)

Consensus (Dec 2025):

Price Target:

EPS Estimates:

6. Comparative Data ✓

File: tx_quantitative_analysis.json

Peer Comparison (6 companies):

Ticker Name P/E P/B Div Beta
TX Ternium 13.3 0.63 7.17% 1.30
MT ArcelorMittal 12.7 0.60 1.26% 1.68
NUE Nucor 23.1 1.81 1.39% 1.87
STLD Steel Dynamics 22.8 2.79 1.19% 1.48
X US Steel N/A N/A 1.46% N/A
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs N/A 1.18 0% 1.98

Sector Averages:

TX Relative Valuation:


FILES GENERATED

Raw Data Files

  1. tx_finnhub_data.json (102 KB)

    • Quote, profile, financials, news, earnings, recommendations, peers
  2. tx_yfinance_data.json (187 KB)

    • Full info dict, 3Y history, financial statements, dividends, institutional holders
  3. tx_quantitative_analysis.json (3.8 KB)

    • Volatility metrics, beta, technical levels, peer comparison, sector averages

Analysis Reports

  1. tx_quant_summary.md (2.0 KB)

    • Formatted quantitative summary with tables
  2. tx_comprehensive_quant_report_2025-12-03.md (19 KB, 571 lines)

    • Complete analysis report covering all 6 requirements
    • Executive summary
    • Current quote data
    • Historical price & volatility analysis
    • Financial metrics
    • Recent news & events
    • Analyst data
    • Comparative peer analysis
    • Technical analysis
    • Risk factors
    • Data quality notes
  3. tx_quant_quick_reference_2025-12-03.md (6.5 KB)

    • One-page quick reference with key metrics
    • Tables for easy scanning
    • Investment thesis quantified
  4. tx_data_delivery_summary.md (this file)

    • Summary of all deliverables

DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE

Validation Performed

Data Freshness

Known Limitations


USAGE NOTES FOR QWANT AGENT

Recommended Modeling Priority

  1. Dividend Sustainability Model

    • Input: 7.17% yield, 93% payout, -$767M FCF
    • Question: Can TX maintain $2.70 dividend?
    • Method: Stress test OCF, capex cycle, margin scenarios
  2. Margin Recovery Probability

    • Input: Current 13.9% gross margin vs 25% historical
    • Question: What's probability of return to 20%+ margins?
    • Method: Historical steel cycle analysis, peer comparison
  3. Valuation Model (Multiple Approaches)

    • DDM: 7.17% yield, 20.9% growth, terminal value
    • Relative: -26% P/E discount, -55% P/B discount justified?
    • DCF: Margin recovery scenarios, capex normalization
  4. Risk-Adjusted Returns

    • Input: 29.4% vol, 0.786 beta, 0.408 correlation
    • Question: TX vs peers risk-adjusted attractiveness?
    • Method: Sharpe ratio, Sortino ratio, downside capture
  5. Technical Breakout Model

    • Input: Price at $38.44, R1 at $39.86, strong momentum
    • Question: Probability of breakout to $42-45 targets?
    • Method: Monte Carlo with 29.4% vol, support/resistance levels

Key Data Locations

For volatility calculations:

For beta/correlation:

For financial modeling:

For peer comparison:

For technical analysis:


CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS DATA (if applicable)

Price Movement:

Analyst Sentiment:

Technical Position:

Risk Factors:


NEXT STEPS

For Quantitative Validation

  1. Run valuation models using:

    • Forward P/E: 5.2x (vs 17.9x sector)
    • Dividend: 7.17% yield, 20.9% growth
    • Margin recovery: 13.9% → target scenarios
  2. Calculate probabilities:

    • P(dividend cut) given 93% payout, neg FCF
    • P(margin recovery to 20%+) given current 13.9%
    • P(breakout above $40) given technical setup
  3. Risk-adjust returns:

    • Compare TX Sharpe vs peers
    • Downside risk (29.4% vol, support at $31.49)
    • Portfolio impact (0.786 beta, 0.408 correlation)
  4. Scenario analysis:

    • Bull: Margins recover, dividend sustained, breakout
    • Base: Current yield, modest recovery, range-bound
    • Bear: Dividend cut, margin pressure, retest $30
  5. Position sizing:

    • Given 29.4% volatility
    • Given dividend cut risk
    • Given high payout ratio

CONTACT / SUPPORT

Data location: /home/pengacau/pasar-malam/output/

Primary files for modeling:

Scripts for re-running:

To refresh data:

uv run python scripts/tx_comprehensive_data.py
uv run python scripts/tx_quant_analysis.py

Data collection complete. Ready for quantitative modeling.

Timestamp: December 3, 2025, 23:00 EST
Status: ✓ All requirements met
Quality: High (multi-source validated)