Ultra-Aggressive Stock Screening Analysis

Date: December 7, 2025

Trading Window: Dec 9-19, 2025 (10 trading days)


CRITICAL RISK ALERT

FOMC Meeting: December 17, 2025

This Federal Reserve meeting occurs within our trading window (Day 7 of 10). This presents:

Implications for 5x SPY Strategy:


Market Context

SPY Performance:

VIX: 15.41 (Moderate volatility, normal market)

EUR/USD: 1.1643 Investable Capital: $1,476.27 USD


Screening Results Summary

Initial Universe: 10 ultra-aggressive candidates

Passed Initial Filters: 1 (CRSP only)

Technical Setup Scores (out of 8):

  1. TSLA - Score 4/8 (Best technical setup)
  2. PLTR - Score 4/8 (Best technical setup)
  3. IONQ - Score 3/8
  4. CRSP - Score 3/8
  5. All others: 0-1/8

Top 6 Candidates Analysis

Tier 1: Strong Technical Setups (Highest Momentum)

1. PLTR (Palantir Technologies)

Price: $181.76 | Beta: 1.50 | Setup: 4/8

Momentum:

Technical:

Risk Profile:

Qualitative:

Verdict: Best risk/reward in Tier 1. Clean red flags, strong momentum both periods.


2. TSLA (Tesla)

Price: $455.00 | Beta: 1.88 | Setup: 4/8

Momentum:

Technical:

Risk Profile:

Qualitative:

Verdict: Strong setup but near resistance. Higher risk than PLTR due to news concerns.


Tier 2: High Volatility Momentum Plays

3. IONQ (Quantum Computing)

Price: $52.69 | Beta: 2.62 | Setup: 3/8

Momentum:

Technical:

Risk Profile:

Qualitative:

Verdict: Highest upside potential BUT highest risk. Weekly momentum exceptional but monthly negative concerning. Far from support means big downside risk.


4. CRSP (CRISPR Therapeutics)

Price: $56.88 | Beta: 1.73 | Setup: 3/8

Momentum:

Technical:

Risk Profile:

Qualitative:

Verdict: Clean profile, strong momentum both periods, but liquidity concerns and near resistance.


Tier 3: High Beta, Weaker Setups

5. ARM (ARM Holdings)

Price: $141.31 | Beta: 4.25 (HIGHEST) | Setup: 1/8

Momentum:

Technical:

Risk Profile:

Qualitative:

Verdict: Highest beta interesting for 5x target, but weak technical setup and monthly negative.


6. COIN (Coinbase)

Price: $269.73 | Beta: 3.69 | Setup: 0/8

Momentum:

Technical:

Risk Profile:

Qualitative:

Verdict: High beta/volatility but poor setup. Monthly performance terrible.


Rejected Candidates

MSTR (MicroStrategy): HIGH RISK - REJECTED

AMD: Weak momentum (-0.8% week), below SMAs, no setup

NVDA: Below SMAs (-1.1%), week momentum only +1.4%, weak setup

SMCI: Low setup score (1/8), mixed signals


Correlation Considerations

High Correlation Expected:

Lower Correlation:

Implication: Diversification limited. If market tanks on FOMC, all positions likely hurt.


Key Metrics Comparison

Ticker Price Beta Week% Month% Setup Flags Volatility Liquidity
PLTR 181.76 1.50 +8.52 +2.15 4/8 0 1.61% 50M
TSLA 455.00 1.88 +5.78 +5.93 4/8 1 2.37% 80M
IONQ 52.69 2.62 +11.82 -11.10 3/8 1 5.86% 23M
CRSP 56.88 1.73 +9.03 +3.19 3/8 0 3.45% 2.5M
ARM 141.31 4.25 +4.67 -7.26 1/8 0 1.49% 3.6M
COIN 269.73 3.69 +3.81 -12.75 0/8 1 3.47% 10M

Preliminary Recommendations

Scenario A: Hold Through FOMC (Full 10 days)

Top 3 Picks:

  1. PLTR (40%) - Cleanest profile, strong setup, both momentum periods positive
  2. IONQ (35%) - Highest momentum, extreme volatility for 5x target
  3. CRSP (25%) - Biotech diversification, clean flags, both periods positive

Rationale:

Risk: FOMC volatility could destroy all positions if Fed hawkish


Scenario B: Exit Before FOMC (Only 5 trading days Dec 9-13)

Top 3 Picks:

  1. IONQ (50%) - Need extreme volatility to hit 5% in 5 days
  2. PLTR (30%) - Momentum continuation play
  3. CRSP (20%) - Catalyst news momentum

Rationale:

Risk: Insufficient time to hit 5% target unless names explode


Scenario C: Two-Position Concentrated Bet

Top 2 Picks:

  1. PLTR (60%) - Best risk/reward, cleanest setup
  2. IONQ (40%) - Highest upside, extreme volatility

Rationale:

Risk: No diversification, both tech sector


Critical Questions for Qwant Agent

  1. Quantitative correlation analysis: How correlated are PLTR, IONQ, CRSP, TSLA?
  2. Factor scoring: Which stocks rank highest on momentum (40%), volatility (30%), quality (20%), value (10%)?
  3. Risk-adjusted returns: Accounting for FOMC volatility, what's expected return distribution?
  4. Position sizing: For €1,271.97 budget, optimal allocation to hit 5% target with <10% max loss?
  5. FOMC impact modeling: Historical volatility around Fed meetings - should we exit before?

Next Steps

  1. DECISION POINT: Determine FOMC strategy

    • Option A: Hold through (10 days, high risk)
    • Option B: Exit before FOMC (5 days, compressed timeframe)
    • Option C: Cancel strategy entirely due to FOMC risk
  2. Invoke qwant agent for quantitative scoring once strategy confirmed

  3. Final recommendation with specific entry prices, position sizes, exit strategy


Analyst Notes

Concern: The FOMC meeting on Dec 17 is a critical risk factor that may make this 2-week strategy inappropriate. The pm research tool flagged all candidates as "STRONG AVOID" with EXTREME risk due to FOMC.

Alternative consideration:

Recommendation to user: Assess risk tolerance for FOMC volatility before proceeding with qwant analysis.